The road ahead: What evidence would justify more autonomy?
Before removing an approval step, ask what evidence would justify the change, what the trial cannot show, and what would reverse the decision.
Before removing an approval step, ask what evidence would justify the change, what the trial cannot show, and what would reverse the decision.
A proposed trial for redesigning one workflow around AI, with explicit baselines, worker input, learning checks, and a decision to stop.
A fictional incident workflow follows an AI-assisted rollback from alert to verified recovery, with explicit authority, handoff, and failure constraints.
Job postings show which skills employers ask for, not what caused a wage premium. Build a development plan without mistaking either for a guarantee.
A proposal for practising independent diagnosis in AI-assisted engineering, with synthetic exercises and tests of whether the learning transfers.
Sleeper-agent experiments show why cleaner evaluations do not prove harmful behaviour is gone, and why production checks need independent evidence.
AI suggestions can improve an individual story while making a collection of stories more alike. Quality and variety need separate tests.
How to turn autonomy policy into testable action conditions, using a hypothetical booking service to examine consent, reversibility, retries, and the cost of delay.
AI coding tools can accelerate a bounded task and slow experienced maintainers. Measure the work you actually need to finish.
A proposed review framework for checking an agent's diagnosis, scope, lasting outcome, downstream effects, and context freshness beyond a successful tool call.
How to keep shared AI governance rules while tailoring controls to each use, with explicit ownership, testable evidence, and reassessment when permissions change.
Better assisted work and better learning are different outcomes. A classroom experiment shows why the distinction matters.
A practical cost model for human review, with a hypothetical payback calculation, sensitivity checks, and cases where oversight does not break even.
AI can narrow performance gaps on a task. That does not mean it gives novices an expert's knowledge, pay, or independence.
What the ToxicSkills audit found, what its numbers do not prove, and how to limit the damage from a compromised agent skill.
How a procedure earns permission to act: scoped approvals, independent checks, and withdrawing autonomy when conditions change.
Human-AI routing only helps if the router can identify a useful difference in ability. A chess experiment shows both the opportunity and the difficulty.
What public studies reveal about persistent code-quality issues, the limits of AI-versus-human comparisons, and reviewing architectural change.
AI can improve human work without making human-plus-AI the best option. Design for amplification, then test it against the alternatives.
What an EEG experiment, a knowledge-worker survey, and a perspective paper tell us about AI, critical thinking, and meaningful human oversight.
Automating a task can help a worker, replace their work, or create demand elsewhere. The outcome depends on how jobs and institutions change.
The six-pillar argument for why HITL is not a transitional compromise but a structural requirement of any production AI system.
A decentralized, multi-layered access control architecture for agentic AI in critical cloud infrastructure.
53 research papers argue HITL is a structural requirement of any production AI system.
Five-generation maturity model from manual troubleshooting to autonomous incident resolution.
Multi-agent orchestration framework for autonomous network incident resolution with safety guarantees.
CLI and MCP are complementary transport layers. Evaluated across 14 dimensions with benchmarks.
Seven practical strategies covering NSGs, Private Links, Azure Policies, AVNM, and shift-left practices.